A federal judge has noted a willingness of the new Texas abortion security law that requires abortionists to have admission privileges in a local hospital.
Lifesitews reported on Monday that, in response to a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood; ACLU; and a boxes of abortion, including dres. Alan Braid, Lamar Robinson and Pamela Richter; The United States District Judge Lee Yeakel said that the inability of abortion to admit that a woman injured in a local hospital “does not have a rational relationship to improve patient care.”
Yeakel also modified a section of the new State Law that establishes new security regulations for the use of RU-486. The provisions in the law that prohibit abortion at 20 weeks and require that abortion facilities comply with the same standards as outpatient surgical facilities remained in place.
The arrangement that the hospital required privileges for abortionists intended to reduce the patient’s abandonment, a situation in which abortionists make a woman a hospital without providing sufficient information about the emergence of the patient’s condition.
According to Lifesitenews, Planned Parenthood had accused of such abandonment in the case of Tonya Reaves, who bleeding to death after an abortion in Chicago last year. Yeakel, however, ruled that even Texas’s law would not guarantee such behavior to be “assigned.”
In the 26 -page opinion, the judge said that the provision could force abortion in remote areas outside the business “places a substantial obstacle on the path of a woman who seeks abortion of a non -viable fetus and, therefore, is an undue burden here.”
Yeakel also ordered that the provision of the law that requires that the abortions RU-486 and the misoprostol be administered in accordance with the norms accepted by the FDA could not be applied to women in the stages of between 50 and 63 days of gestation, which are medically unable to have a surgical abortion and what “life or health” is at risk.
Most medical abortions are not carried out in accordance with the procedure approved by the FDA, which is, as he recognized, “requires more time of a doctor” and is “marginally more expensive.”
Attorney General Greg Abbott, who runs for the republican nomination for governor in 2014, said heer appeals the case to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, but also indicated that he imagines the Befemet case.
Governor Rick Perry (R) said the ruling “will not stop our continuous efforts to protect life and ensure that the women of our state are not exposed to the horror stories of abortion mills that have recently appeared.”
Perry added that the pro-life laws “reflect the will and values of the Texans.”
State Senator Wendy Davis (D), who recently announced an attempt to run for the governor, amounted to national fame as an abortion defender at the end of time. Davis filibusterized the bill aimed at guaranteeing the health and safety of women who obstruct abortions, postponing their approval.
Lila Rose, live action president, said in a statement:
Another activist judge, this time in Texas, has unilaterally decided that a elected state legislature enforces the provisions that save lives for women. This contempt for the safety of women among our Judiciary has become a devastating trend.
Pro-Vida organizations and worried independent citizens have documented the ambulance after the ambulance sends the injured mothers from abortion facilities to hospitals. This should be proof that these doctors are unfortunately inqualified to repair the horrors that are regularly peeked to women. But in addition, women from all over the country should ask themselves: “If my doctor cannot gain the confidence of a hospital, do I really want me to treat me?”
Inspections of abortion facilities regularly produce horrible results: unhealthy tools, stained with blood, furniture and surroundings, from California to Virginia, Delaware and Maryland, and so on. And these are just the incidents we know. Think of Kermit Gosnell, who was not executed for more than a decade because the State did not consider adequate to enforce the type of provisions of common sense and lifeguards that Texas now demands now, and the corresponding women of Houston, who continue.
What offends the abortion industry about hospital admission privileges is that they demand the responsibility of abortionists. Planned Parenthood prefers a Wild West abortion, where they can act with impunity and extra cash rake treating women as cattle in a “meat market.” It is time for judges like Lee Yeakel to stop protecting the results of the abortion industry and remember what it really counts: the safety of mothers and their babies.
In his opinion, Yeakel referred to abortion as “the most divisive issue to face this country from slavery.”
Appointed by President George W. Bush in 2003, Yeakel has ruled on abortion issues before. Last April, he annulled a law that would prohibit Planned Parenthood for recent state funds. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals revoked its ruling a month later.