Google argues DOJ breakup could hurt U.S. economy in battle with China

Ash Google He returns to the courtroom on Monday, the company argues that the US needs the company in its full form to face the Chief Chief Adversary and maintain national security in the process.

The Remedios trial in Washington, DC, follows the decision of a judge in August that Google has had the monopoly in its main internet search market, the most significant antimonopoly decision in the technology industry since the case against Microsoft More than 20 years ago.

The Department of Justice has asked Google to disintegrate its Chrome browser unit and open its search data to the rivals. Google said in a blog post on Monday that such movement is not the best for the country, since the global battle for supremacy in artificial intelligence intensifies rapidly. In the first paragraph of the publication, Google appointed Deepseek from China as an emerging competitor of AI.

The proposal of the Department of Justice “The hamstrings how we develop the AI, and would make a committee appointed by the Government regulate the design and development of our products”, Lee-Anne Mulholland, vice president of Google regulatory issues, writes in the position. “That would contain American innovation at a critical situation. We are in a fiercely competitive global career with China for the next generation of technological leadership, and Google is at the forefront of US companies that make scientific and technological advances.”

Google is one of the number or United States technology companies trying to defend themselves against the anti -Rusting activities of the Trump administration, Must or that is a hero of the Biden Administration. Google lost a separate antitrust case last week, when a federal judge ruled on Thursday that Google maintained illegal monopolies in online advertising markets due to their position between advertisement buyers and vendors.

Goal It is currently in court against the Federal Commerce Commission, which has claimed that the company monopolizes the social media market and should not have been able to acquire Instagram and WhatsApp. Amazon It also faces a demand from the FTC for allegedly maintaining an illegal monopoly. And beyond the antimonopoly, Trump’s FTC on Monday thirst SuperAccusing the deceptive billing and cancellation practices transport company linked to its subscription service.

It is the type of application actions that the technology industry expected to avoid when President Trump Tok in January. Google, Meta, Amazon and Uber, and the senior executives of some, publicly donated to the Trump opening background, part of a generalized corporate effort to benefit from the incoming administration.

For Google, the search remedy trial will determine the consequences of the guilt verdict from August. The three -week trial will end on May 9. Judge Amit Mehta is expected to make his ruling in August, at which time Google plans to present an appeal.

“In the trial we will show how the unprecedented proposals of the DOJ go to miles beyond the decision of the Court, and would harm consumers, the economy and the technological leadership of the United States,” Mulholland wrote.

Google plans to argue that Chrome provides freedom. The browser helps people access the web, and other companies used their open source code. One of the proposals of the Department of Justice is that Google opens its search data, such as search consultations, clicks and results to other companies.

That “would introduce not only cyber security and equally national security risks, but also increase the cost of its devices,” Google said.

A central part of Google’s challenge is to achieve a balance between the bee as essential for American innovation, but it is not so essential that other companies cannot compete, particularly when it comes to ia.

Google is likely to promote how AI innovation has fed for years and indicate the research work “Transformers”, which provided a technical architecture used in chatbots of AI such as the OpenAi chatpt, perplexity and anthropic.

The Department of Justice has said that in the search, “Google agreements continue to isolate the Google monopoly.” The department plans to bring testimony of Nick Turley, Product Manager of Chatgpt and the Commercial Director of Perplexity Dmitry Shevelenko.

In a blog post on Monday, Perpleity said that “the remedy is not rupture,” but that consumers should have more options. The company said telephone manufacturers should be able to sacrifice their customers a variety of search options “without fear of financial sanctions or access restrictions.”

“Consumers deserve the best products, not only those who pay the most for placement,” Perplexity wrote. “This is the only remedy that guarantees that consumer choice can determine the winners.”

Look: Google, goal Fight Cases Antimonopoolio in the same Palace of Justice