Islamabad, Pakistan – Pakistan threatened to suspend all bilateral agreements with India, including the 1972 Simla Agreement, Thursday in a retaliation movement after India said it would suspend the Indo Water Treaty and close the border the front day.
The Simla agreement was a peace agreement signed by the two countries a few months after Bangladesh became independent of Pakistan.
In a statement issued after a meeting of the National Security Committee (NSC), the main civil-military decision-making body of Pakistan, Pakistan warned India that any interruption of its water supply would be considered, adding experiments, adding Consce, complete spectrum of national power. ”
The NSC meeting, which took place on Thursday in Islamabad, was led by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, along with other government officials and heads of their military forces.
The NSC Statement Mirrored Actions Announounce by India On Wednesday, and Included The Closure of the Wagah Border post with “Immediate Effect”, The suspension and cancellation of Saarc Visas for Indian Nationals (Excluding Sikh Pilonan Non -Defcecea, in Pakistation of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian of Indian Defcececea, In Designation of Indian, in Pakistation of Indian, In Designation of Indian, Ingence, In the Designation of Indian, Reduction in the Staff of the High Commission of India, the closure of the Paquistani airspace to the Indian airlines and the suspension of all trade with India.
The movements follow India’s response to Tuesday’s attack against tourists in Kashmir administered by India, which resulted in the death of at least 26 people.
After a cabinet meeting on Wednesday, chaired by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Indian government announced a series of measures, including the suspension of the 65 -year -old Indus Water Treaty, a pact that allows both. Countries.
In a media conference, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of India, Vikram Misri, also announced the closure of the border with Pakistan, cut the amount of Indian diplomatic personnel in Pakistan, ordered the Pakistani citizens under the SAARC scheme to leave the country within 48 hours and expelled Pakistani military vestiles published in India. This response has been deeply interpreted as India blaming Pakistan for the Kashmir attack.
The territory of the Himalayas of Kashmiro has been a point of inflammation between the two countries since they obtained the independence of the British domain in 1947, with each country controlling parts of Kashmiro but claiming it in its entirety. Since independence, neighbors with nuclear weapons have fought four wars, three of them on Kashmir.
Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, who also serves as Vice Prime Minister, described the “immature and hurried” Indian steps in a television interview on Wednesday night.
“India has not given any evidence [of Pakistani involvement in the attack]. “They have a maturity note in their response is not a serious approach.
Defense Minister Khawaja Asif also rejected the involvement of India of Pakistani participation in the attack.
“India’s accusation against Pakistan for Pahalgam’s incident is inappropriate. There should be no ambiguity that we strongly condemn terrorism,” Asif said.
‘Ready to Indian misfortune’
After Pahalgam’s attack, comments in the Indian media and the talk between political leadership have leaned towards the launch of a military strike over Pakistan, establishing parallels with the 2019 Balakot strikes.
In February 2019, after an attack in pulwama, Cashmiro administered by India, in which they killed 40 of 40 Indian soldiers, India launched air attacks in Balakot, in northern Pakistan, pointing to what he called “militant hiding places.”
Pakistan said the strikes only hit an uninhabited forest and responded with their own air attacks near Indian military objectives, without causing victims.
Both parties also deployed combat airplanes and, in a aerial dog fight, an Indian plane was shot down. His pilot, Abhinandan Varthaman, was captured but released two days later.
India’s Minister of Defense, Rajnath Singh, also hinted at a “strong response”, reiterating the “zero tolerance” policy of India about terrorism.
“We will not only communicate with those who have carried out this incident. We will also reach those who, sitting behind the scene, have conspired to commit such disastrous acts in the floor of India,” he said, in the Marshal of the Singh Singh Singh Singh Air Force.
Security analysts and officials in Pakistan say they believe that Indian military action Now it could be possible, but said that the country was “ready for any Indian misfortune.”
“We are maintaining a high level of alert and surveillance, but unlike India, we do not want to create any unnecessary exaggeration talking about our preparation,” a safety source told Al Jazeera on condition of the matter.
“India is wrong, he thinks there will be no tit for Tat. However, we are both countries with nuclear weapons, and Indian aggression could lead to an irresponsible situation. We should both act carefully,” Hey added.
The official also questioned the complaint of the Pakistani participation of India, noting that the attack tok places almost 200 km (124 miles) of the control line, the de facto border between the two countries, and highlighted the presence of more value Faller Faller Faller Faller Falling the presence of more Vally Thet Sashon Valle Fally Fally Faly
He also pointed out the recent visit to India by the United States vice president, JD Vance, who arrived in the country on Monday with his wife and two children for a four -day visit, bar at a meeting with the Prime Minister’s ways.
“How do you think this attack will serve Pakistan, especially with JD Vance there?” Hello Ash. “Could this attack lead to the liberation of the Indian Kashmir? Why do the Indian authorities won take the time to look in and intrect? Will they accept their own security deficiencies?”
‘Fight Syndrome to finish’
Adjusted skirmishes have previously raised the spectrum of the war between the two countries, which together have a population that comes out of 1.5 billion.
Asfandyar Mir, specialization of security analysts in southern Asia, said that Pakistan is likely to reserve his military response for a contingency in case of Indian Action while monitoring how the suspension of the Indo Water Treaty develops.
The Indo basin is a lifeguard for the populations of Pakistan and India, which depend on the river water flowing from the Himalayas for irrigation and agriculture.
However, Mir added that military action seems to be a probable option for India, similar to 2019, but “more visible enhanced.”
Referring to indignation for Tuesday’s attack and demands a strong response in the Indian media, he said: “The domestic mood in India is very trend towards an answer. That said, India faces a more acute China challenge than in 2019, so it has to be carefully taken into account in its response and how a climbing can develop,” he told Al Jazeera.
China, the neighbor of northern India, is also one or the closest allies of Pakistan. China and India participated in a minor conflict on its border in June 2020.
On the other hand, Salman Bashir, former Pakistani sent to New Delhi, told Al Jazeera that he believes that the decisions taken by the Security Committee of the Indian Cabinet have been based on a “erroneous assumption” about the appetizer of Pakistan.
“They connote a fighting syndrome, which is based on naive thought and illusions. But I expect a response from Pakistan that is mature and in accordance with the challenge raised by India,” he added.
Bashir, who also served as Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan from 2008 to 2012, said that the Indian government led by the Bharatiya Janata (BJP) party may have considered the Milecia action, but the scale of such movements, given the story between.
“In any case, Pakistan will not assume that this is. We should be prepared for more than arriving.
‘Lessons are not learned’
Mir, the Washington DC -based security analyst said that Pakistan is more stable than in previous years and that he believes that the country is likely to respond with force under the head of the army as well as Munir, who has been aggression.
Pakistan has blamed India for violence on her ground, more recently she accused her or teacher of the March attack against Jaffar Express, a steps -led by Baloch separatists.
The 36 -hour confrontation, in which at least 26 passengers were killed, was the first kidnapping of Pakistan trains.
However, Mir said that both parties have not been able to get constructive lessons from the crisis of 2019.
“The relative calm we saw after 2019 was largely a function of the bold reconciliation by the former Pakistani army chief, General Bajwa and India, chose to focus on his border with China and his ambition to become a global power.
Bashir, the former sent, said that Pakistan could make a great gesture if Prime Minister Sharif announces a visit to India.
“In Pakistan-India situations, gestures like Shehbaz Sharif announce a visit to New Delhi are feasible. The pendulum has turned too far. We need to do whatever it takes to control things,” he said.